Fig Security Operations Resilience vs Ripple: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Fig Security Operations Resilience

Mid-market and enterprise SOCs drowning in alert fatigue from broken detection rules will find immediate relief in Fig Security Operations Resilience; it's the only tool that automatically catches and fixes drift when your SIEM rules break upstream, then tests and deploys fixes without manual triage. The platform covers drift detection, root cause analysis, and deployment across Elasticsearch, AWS, and Databricks, meaning you're not juggling separate tools for each data stack. This isn't for teams with stable, rarely-changing detection pipelines or organizations needing strong incident recovery workflows; Fig prioritizes keeping your existing rules alive over post-breach response orchestration.

Ripple

Security teams managing fragmented tool stacks without a coordinated incident response workflow should evaluate Ripple for its ability to trigger synchronized actions across disconnected systems in seconds. The free pricing model with 279 GitHub stars suggests active community validation of the core panic-button use case. Skip this if your stack already includes a mature SOAR platform with native orchestration; Ripple fills the gap for teams that need speed over feature depth, but won't replace workflow automation at scale.