Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Rawstream DNS Filtering is a commercial network access control tool by Rawstream. ThreatLocker Network Control is a commercial network access control tool by threatlocker. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best network access control fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs without dedicated security ops will get immediate value from Rawstream DNS Filtering because it blocks threats at the DNS layer with zero endpoint agents to manage. The unlimited block and allow lists, native dynamic IP support, and real-time reporting give you visibility and control without the operational overhead of traditional gateway appliances. Skip this if you need SIEM integration or advanced threat hunting; Rawstream is a point solution that excels at what it does, not a detection platform.
SMB and mid-market ops teams drowning in firewall sprawl across endpoints and servers should pick ThreatLocker Network Control for its ability to close unauthorized ports automatically within five minutes, eliminating the manual ACL chasing that kills your weekends. The cloud-based console enforces policy across your entire estate from one pane, and it plays nicely with or replaces Windows Firewall so you're not ripping out infrastructure. Skip this if you need deep behavioral analytics or threat hunting; ThreatLocker prioritizes access control and visibility over anomaly detection, making it a tactical network gating tool rather than a detection platform.
Cloud-based DNS filtering solution for blocking malicious sites and content
Centrally managed endpoint/server firewall with dynamic ACLs for network control
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Rawstream DNS Filtering vs ThreatLocker Network Control for your network access control needs.
Rawstream DNS Filtering: Cloud-based DNS filtering solution for blocking malicious sites and content. built by Rawstream. Core capabilities include DNS-level threat blocking, Cloud-based filtering service, Over 80 web content categories..
ThreatLocker Network Control: Centrally managed endpoint/server firewall with dynamic ACLs for network control. built by threatlocker. Core capabilities include Centralized firewall management for endpoints and servers, Dynamic ACL-based access control, Policy-based network access using IP address, keywords, or agent authentication..
Both serve the Network Access Control market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Rawstream DNS Filtering differentiates with DNS-level threat blocking, Cloud-based filtering service, Over 80 web content categories. ThreatLocker Network Control differentiates with Centralized firewall management for endpoints and servers, Dynamic ACL-based access control, Policy-based network access using IP address, keywords, or agent authentication.
Rawstream DNS Filtering is developed by Rawstream. ThreatLocker Network Control is developed by threatlocker. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Rawstream DNS Filtering and ThreatLocker Network Control serve similar Network Access Control use cases: both are Network Access Control tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox