Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Filigran OpenAEV is a commercial breach & attack simulation tool by Filigran. PT Dephaze is a commercial breach & attack simulation tool by Positive Technologies. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best breach & attack simulation fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams with mature EDR deployments will get the most from Filigran OpenAEV because it validates whether your existing detection stack actually catches real attacks instead of just assuming coverage. The platform's MITRE ATT&CK-aligned simulation library and AI-assisted scenario creation mean you're testing threats your environment actually faces, not generic templates, and the agentless architecture lets you start validating immediately without EDR replacement costs. Skip this if you need a turnkey solution that works without an EDR already in place; OpenAEV assumes you own the detection layer and want to stress-test it.
Open-source threat-informed exposure validation platform for attack simulation
Agentless automated pentest platform for continuous infrastructure security testing.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Filigran OpenAEV vs PT Dephaze for your breach & attack simulation needs.
Filigran OpenAEV: Open-source threat-informed exposure validation platform for attack simulation. built by Filigran. Core capabilities include Threat intelligence-driven attack scenario creation, MITRE ATT&CK-based simulation library, Agentless EDR integration (bring your own EDR)..
PT Dephaze: Agentless automated pentest platform for continuous infrastructure security testing. built by Positive Technologies. Core capabilities include Agentless automated penetration testing of internal IT infrastructure, Configurable test parameters including IP ranges, exclusions, and target systems, Infrastructure scanning and service reconnaissance to identify lateral movement paths..
Both serve the Breach & Attack Simulation market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Filigran OpenAEV differentiates with Threat intelligence-driven attack scenario creation, MITRE ATT&CK-based simulation library, Agentless EDR integration (bring your own EDR). PT Dephaze differentiates with Agentless automated penetration testing of internal IT infrastructure, Configurable test parameters including IP ranges, exclusions, and target systems, Infrastructure scanning and service reconnaissance to identify lateral movement paths.
Filigran OpenAEV is developed by Filigran. PT Dephaze is developed by Positive Technologies. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Filigran OpenAEV and PT Dephaze serve similar Breach & Attack Simulation use cases: both are Breach & Attack Simulation tools, both cover MITRE Attack, Red Team, Security Validation. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox