Gambit Security Balens vs ProLion ClusterLion: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Gambit Security Balens

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in backup and cloud infrastructure visibility gaps will find immediate value in Gambit Security Balens because it maps dependencies and restore-point health across your entire stack without agents. The platform scores strongly on NIST ID.AM and RC.RP, meaning it surfaces what you actually own and whether you can actually recover from ransomware; that immutability validation catches the backups attackers compromised before you touch them. Skip this if you need heavy detection and threat hunting capabilities; Balens is built for resilience posture and recovery readiness, not for finding active compromise.

ProLion ClusterLion

Mid-market and enterprise operations teams managing critical data across Dell or NetApp storage will value ClusterLion for eliminating the complexity of traditional clustering without sacrificing automated failover; the platform removes shared storage requirements entirely, which cuts both infrastructure cost and failure points that plague conventional HA setups. On-premises deployment and support for PowerScale, MetroCluster, and PowerStore environments means you're not rearchitecting your existing storage layer. Skip this if your priority is detection and forensics rather than pure uptime; ClusterLion's NIST coverage tilts heavily toward recovery execution, not incident detection.