Progress ShareFile User Authentication vs RSA ID Plus: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Mid-market and enterprise teams standardizing on ShareFile for file sharing will find Progress ShareFile User Authentication the natural fit because it eliminates the friction of bolting on a separate MFA provider. Password policy enforcement, SAML 2.0 SSO, and device lock-and-wipe capabilities align directly with NIST's Identity Management function without adding integration overhead. Skip this if you need adaptive authentication or passwordless options; Progress is playing the traditional MFA and policy game, not reimagining it. Mid-market and enterprise teams standardized on Active Directory who need passwordless authentication without ripping out their infrastructure will get the most from RSA ID Plus. The platform handles hybrid and on-premises deployments that competitors often force to the cloud, and its risk-based authentication powered by RSA Risk AI actually adjusts access controls based on behavioral anomalies rather than just layering on another factor. Skip this if you're a pure-cloud shop or need identity verification as a revenue-generating product; RSA ID Plus is built for internal workforce access, not customer-facing identity.