Jamf Connect vs Progress ShareFile User Authentication: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Jamf Connect

Mac-first security teams need Jamf Connect if conditional access policies matter more than VPN replacement; it enforces device trust and user context continuously rather than treating network access as binary. The tool covers both PR.AA (identity and access control) and PR.IR (infrastructure resilience) under NIST CSF 2.0, which reflects tight integration between authentication and zero trust enforcement across cloud and on-premises apps. Skip this if your workforce is Windows-dominant or if you need deep device forensics; Jamf Connect assumes macOS is your primary endpoint concern.

Progress ShareFile User Authentication

Mid-market and enterprise teams standardizing on ShareFile for file sharing will find Progress ShareFile User Authentication the natural fit because it eliminates the friction of bolting on a separate MFA provider. Password policy enforcement, SAML 2.0 SSO, and device lock-and-wipe capabilities align directly with NIST's Identity Management function without adding integration overhead. Skip this if you need adaptive authentication or passwordless options; Progress is playing the traditional MFA and policy game, not reimagining it.