Living Security Human Risk Management vs Perseus: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Living Security Human Risk Management

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in phishing click rates and re-trained users will see immediate lift from Living Security Human Risk Management because it scores and re-scores individual users in real time rather than treating awareness as an annual checkbox. The platform's behavioral intervention automation directly addresses NIST PR.AT and DE.CM by closing the gap between awareness training completion and actual risk reduction on the network. Skip this if your organization lacks the staffing to act on user-level risk signals or if you need a tool that doubles as your primary detection layer; Living Security is deliberately focused on behavior change, not threat detection.

Perseus

SMBs with thin security teams who need incident response muscle should look at Perseus for its 24/7 managed IR paired with awareness training and pen testing, eliminating the need to staff or contract separate vendors for those functions. The platform covers five of seven NIST RS functions (Incident Management through Recovery), meaning Perseus handles the response and forensics work your team likely can't do alone. Skip this if you're looking for detection-heavy continuous monitoring; Perseus treats monitoring as a risk assessment input, not its primary strength.