What features do Peraton ThreatBoard vs Lunar offer?

**Peraton ThreatBoard** differentiates with Autonomous ingestion of threat data from multiple sources and formats, AI and machine learning-driven threat data correlation and enrichment, Automated aggregation, tagging, validation of threat intelligence. **Lunar** differentiates with Compromised credentials monitoring from breach dumps and infostealer logs, Stolen session cookie and access token intelligence, Forensic context including malware paths, hardware IDs, and malware families.

Who makes Peraton ThreatBoard vs Lunar?

**Peraton ThreatBoard** is developed by Peraton. **Lunar** is developed by Webz.io founded in 2015-01-01T00:00:00.000Z. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Peraton ThreatBoard a good alternative to Lunar?

Peraton ThreatBoard and Lunar serve similar Threat Intelligence Platforms use cases: both are Threat Intelligence Platforms tools, both cover Cyber Threat Intelligence, Threat Feed. Key differences: Peraton ThreatBoard is Commercial while Lunar is Free. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Peraton ThreatBoard vs Lunar (2026) | Compare Threat Intelligence Platforms Tools

Q: What is the difference between Peraton ThreatBoard vs Lunar?

**Peraton ThreatBoard**: Cyber threat intelligence platform with AI-driven analysis and threat hunting. built by Peraton. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include Autonomous ingestion of threat data from multiple sources and formats, AI and machine learning-driven threat data correlation and enrichment, Automated aggregation, tagging, validation of threat intelligence.. **Lunar**: Free breach monitoring platform for compromised credential detection & alerting. built by Webz.io. headquartered in Israel. Core capabilities include Compromised credentials monitoring from breach dumps and infostealer logs, Stolen session cookie and access token intelligence, Forensic context including malware paths, hardware IDs, and malware families.. Both serve the Threat Intelligence Platforms market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.