Pathlock Access Risk Analysis vs TheFence: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Pathlock Access Risk Analysis

Enterprise and mid-market security teams managing sprawling SAP and Oracle estates will get the most from Pathlock Access Risk Analysis because it actually hunts down separation of duties violations across applications simultaneously, not just within them. The tool covers NIST PR.AA and ID.RA requirements through permission-level analysis tied to actual usage activity, which catches the privilege creep that static role reviews miss. Skip this if your organization runs primarily cloud-native applications or lacks mature business application portfolios; Pathlock's value compounds with ERP complexity, not SaaS simplicity.

TheFence

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in access review backlogs will see immediate ROI from TheFence's AI co-pilot, which actually reduces the time spent certifying who should have what instead of just flagging more stuff to review. The platform covers all four NIST CSF 2.0 foundational areas for access control,identity management, continuous monitoring, risk assessment, and asset management,across AWS, Azure, Okta, and SAP without requiring a separate SoD tool. Skip this if your organization has fewer than 50 employees or still does quarterly access reviews on a spreadsheet; TheFence assumes you're already operating at a baseline of access governance discipline.