P0 Security Platform vs Serval Manage Access: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

P0 Security Platform

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in standing access exceptions will actually shrink their attack surface with P0 Security Platform, not just audit it; the platform forces privilege down to minutes instead of hours by default through JIT provisioning and converts access policies to least-privilege automatically rather than leaving that conversion to manual spreadsheet work. The Access Graph ties user identities, non-human identities, and agents into a single queryable model, which means you can finally answer "who can reach the database" without three emails to the platform team. Skip this if your organization has fewer than 200 privileged users or you're not ready to decommission standing admin accounts; P0 assumes you want to actually eliminate the excess, not just monitor it.

Serval Manage Access

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in manual access requests will see immediate friction relief from Serval Manage Access; its just-in-time automation with built-in approval workflows cuts the back-and-forth that makes privileged access management feel like a tax on engineering velocity. The AI-generated custom workflows and one-click revocation directly address NIST PR.AA (access control enforcement), and cloud-native deployment means no infrastructure overhead. Skip this if your organization needs deep integration with legacy on-premises identity systems or demands fine-grained audit reporting that rivals dedicated IGA platforms; Serval prioritizes access speed over exhaustive compliance reporting.