MokN Bait vs OWA Honeypot: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
MokN Bait is a commercial honeypots & deception tool by MokN. OWA Honeypot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in credential stuffing and password spray attacks need MokN Bait because it stops attackers at the moment they try stolen passwords, not weeks later in logs. Cloud deployment means no infrastructure work, and the zero false positive guarantee matters when your SOC is already understaffed; you get signal instead of noise. Skip this if your threat model is primarily external perimeter attacks rather than post-breach lateral movement, or if your team lacks basic credential hygiene to make decoy baits credible.
Security teams protecting on-premises Exchange environments will get real value from OWA Honeypot because it's free and requires minimal setup to start collecting actual attacker behavior against your most-targeted asset. The 70 GitHub stars and active Flask codebase mean you're inheriting a tool others have debugged in production, not a dormant project. Skip this if you're looking for managed honeypot infrastructure or need multi-protocol deception across your entire network; OWA Honeypot is deliberately narrow and requires you to run and monitor it yourself.
