Kaseya 365 Endpoint vs Otava Endpoint Protection: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Kaseya 365 Endpoint

Mid-market and enterprise IT teams managing hybrid infrastructure will find real value in Kaseya 365 Endpoint's bundled RMM, EDR, and MDR with 24/7 SOC coverage, which cuts the typical "tool sprawl" tax on staffing and integration. The platform covers seven NIST CSF 2.0 functions across Protect, Detect, and Respond, with particular strength in continuous monitoring and incident analysis. Skip this if your organization needs best-in-breed EDR that outperforms dedicated point solutions or if you lack the IT ops maturity to sustain cross-product automation; Kaseya's integration advantage only pays off with disciplined deployment.

Otava Endpoint Protection

SMB and mid-market teams that need endpoint protection without hiring a dedicated SOC should choose Otava Endpoint Protection for its fully managed deployment model; the vendor handles tuning and threat response while you get 365-day log retention and compliance reporting built in. Otava covers the essential NIST Detect (continuous monitoring) and Respond (incident analysis) functions through behavioral monitoring and forensics tools, which matters because you're outsourcing the work anyway. Skip this if your organization demands either a pure-play EDR with threat hunting included or a consolidated XDR platform; Otava's strength is managed EPP, not investigation-led response.