Osquery vs MIDAS: 2026 Comparison
Osquery is a free endpoint detection and response tool. MIDAS is a free endpoint detection and response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best endpoint detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams managing macOS fleets at scale should pick Osquery for endpoint visibility that doesn't require expensive commercial EDR licensing; it ships queryable system activity data from thousands of hosts without agent bloat. The tool has been deployed by Meta, Apple, and Uber across hundreds of thousands of endpoints, proving it handles volume. Osquery excels at hunt-driven investigation and compliance baselines but doesn't include behavioral detection or automated response, so teams expecting out-of-the-box threat hunting will need to layer in separate analytics.
Mac-focused security teams protecting pre-2020 infrastructure or lab environments should know MIDAS is archived and unsupported, making it useful only as a reference implementation or for air-gapped systems where patch cycles don't matter. The 826 GitHub stars reflect genuine adoption among macOS defenders before commercial EDR matured on that platform. Skip this entirely if you need vendor support, threat intelligence feeds, or detection rules updated past 2019; MIDAS prioritizes detection mechanics over the operational backbone that modern endpoints require.
