ON2IT Zero Trust vs Xage Secure Remote Access: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

ON2IT Zero Trust

Mid-market and enterprise security teams ready to operationalize zero trust will benefit most from ON2IT Zero Trust because it pairs a working implementation methodology with managed detection rather than leaving you to build policy alone. The vendor delivers a six-day readiness assessment, five-step implementation framework, and 24/7 mSOC coverage across two SOCs, addressing the full span from ID.AM asset visibility through RS.MA incident response. Skip this if your organization still needs foundational identity and access controls before committing to zero trust architecture; ON2IT assumes you're past that stage.

Xage Secure Remote Access

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams managing critical infrastructure will benefit most from Xage Secure Remote Access because it applies zero trust down to individual operational assets like PLCs and RTUs, not just network perimeters. The distributed security fabric with asset-level access control and tamper-proof audit logs directly addresses NIST PR.AA (identity and access control) and DE.CM (continuous monitoring), the two functions that matter most when a compromised credentials can shut down production. Skip this if your OT environment is air-gapped already or if you need a tool that also handles IT asset management; Xage is deliberately OT-focused.