Entro Non-Human Identities vs Oleria Trustfusion: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Entro Non-Human Identities

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in service account sprawl need Entro Non-Human Identities because it actually maps NHI lineage across your entire environment instead of leaving you to guess which bot owns what. The NHIDR engine detects behavioral anomalies in real time, and the platform covers the full lifecycle from discovery through automated remediation, hitting six NIST CSF 2.0 functions from asset management through incident mitigation. Skip this if you're still manually auditing service accounts once a quarter or if you need deep integration with your existing PAM stack; Entro assumes you want velocity over customization.

Oleria Trustfusion

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in identity sprawl across human, non-human, and AI accounts will find real value in Trustfusion's unified identity graph; it's the only move that lets you see privilege creep and dormant access in one place instead of piecing together signals from five different tools. The automated access reviews and tracked remediation workflows cut the manual toil that kills most identity programs before they scale. Skip this if your org is still doing annual access certifications in spreadsheets and your biggest identity headache is basic MFA rollout; Trustfusion assumes you've already won those battles.