What is the difference between Okta Auth0 vs ZITADEL?

**Okta Auth0**: Identity and access management platform for authentication and authorization. built by Auth0. Core capabilities include Email-based authentication, Social login with GitHub, Social login with Google.. **ZITADEL**: Open-source, multi-tenant identity platform for authn, authz, and SSO. built by ZITADEL. Core capabilities include Hosted login page with customizable branding, Multi-factor authentication (MFA) enforcement, Passwordless authentication via Passkeys.. Both serve the Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

What features do Okta Auth0 vs ZITADEL offer?

**Okta Auth0** differentiates with Email-based authentication, Social login with GitHub, Social login with Google. **ZITADEL** differentiates with Hosted login page with customizable branding, Multi-factor authentication (MFA) enforcement, Passwordless authentication via Passkeys.

Who makes Okta Auth0 vs ZITADEL?

**Okta Auth0** is developed by Auth0. **ZITADEL** is developed by ZITADEL. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Okta Auth0 a good alternative to ZITADEL?

Okta Auth0 and ZITADEL serve similar Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On use cases: both are Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On tools, both cover Authentication, Authorization, SSO. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Okta Auth0 vs ZITADEL: 2026 Comparison Guide | CybersecTools

Okta Auth0 vs ZITADEL: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.

Okta Auth0 is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by Auth0. ZITADEL is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by ZITADEL. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best multi-factor authentication and single sign-on fit for your security stack.

CST Verdict

Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:

Okta Auth0

Startups and SMBs needing passwordless authentication without months of implementation will find Auth0 fast to deploy, particularly for social login workflows across web and mobile applications. The platform covers NIST PR.AA identity management and supports free tier access, letting you validate the approach before licensing costs rise. Skip Auth0 if your primary need is device posture checking or conditional access tied to endpoint security signals; it's an identity layer, not an endpoint control system.

Data verified May 2026