Nozzlr v1.1 vs LFI-files: 2026 Comparison
Nozzlr v1.1 is a free penetration testing tool. LFI-files is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running manual penetration tests on internal infrastructure will get the most from Nozzlr v1.1 because its Python-native design lets you embed bruteforcing logic directly into custom assessment scripts without context-switching to a separate tool. The modular architecture and threading support mean you can parallelize credential attacks across multiple targets without rewriting core logic, which the 65 GitHub stars reflect as genuinely useful to practitioners. Skip this if you need a GUI, reporting automation, or support for protocols beyond basic auth; Nozzlr is built for operators who code and expect to maintain their own tooling.
Penetration testers running scheduled wordlist attacks against custom web applications will find LFI-files immediately useful; it's a focused, maintained wordlist that cuts through the noise of generic fuzzing lists with paths actually exploited in LFI chains. At 125 GitHub stars with active commits, it has real adoption from practitioners who've validated the payload patterns. This isn't a tool for teams needing automated vulnerability scanning or remediation guidance; it's purely for manual testing workflows where you control the target and timing.
