MokN Bait vs node-ftp-honeypot: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in credential stuffing and password spray attacks need MokN Bait because it stops attackers at the moment they try stolen passwords, not weeks later in logs. Cloud deployment means no infrastructure work, and the zero false positive guarantee matters when your SOC is already understaffed; you get signal instead of noise. Skip this if your threat model is primarily external perimeter attacks rather than post-breach lateral movement, or if your team lacks basic credential hygiene to make decoy baits credible. Small security teams or researchers who need to observe FTP attack patterns without overhead will find node-ftp-honeypot useful; it's lightweight enough to run on minimal infrastructure and transparent about what it captures. The tool has 6 GitHub stars and sits in active use within honeypot communities, though it lacks the telemetry depth or multi-protocol coverage of commercial alternatives. This is not for teams needing alerting integration, threat intelligence feeds, or deception across SSH, HTTP, or database protocols; you're building a single-purpose FTP trap here.