Fortra ZTNA vs Neeve Remote Access Agent by Cloudbrink: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPN will find Fortra ZTNA's strongest value in its hybrid deployment flexibility and granular access controls that actually enforce least-privilege without admin headaches. The platform covers all four critical NIST CSF 2.0 areas for identity and continuous monitoring, which matters because most ZTNA products punt on asset inventory or detection tuning. Skip this if your org needs deep integration with legacy on-premises identity systems or runs exclusively on-prem; Fortra's strength is in hybrid environments where cloud and datacenter access requirements overlap. Building ops and facilities teams managing legacy BMS and OT systems need remote access that doesn't require VPN infrastructure or hardware changes; Neeve Remote Access Agent solves this by tunneling directly to controllers from desktop and mobile apps through the Neeve portal. The tool maps to NIST PR.AA for access control and PR.IR for infrastructure resilience, meaning you get both authentication enforcement and segmented connectivity without expanding your attack surface. Skip this if your environment is primarily cloud-native SaaS applications or you need cross-platform VPN replacement for general workforce access; Neeve is purpose-built for the OT/BMS use case where legacy systems can't support standard remote access protocols.

Based on our analysis of core features, integrations, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion: