Agilicus vs Neeve Remote Access Agent by Cloudbrink: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Teams protecting OT and ICS environments without the luxury of deploying agents will find Agilicus solves a real problem: clientless zero trust access to PLCs, HMIs, and SCADA systems that can't run traditional security software. The no-inbound-ports architecture means your critical infrastructure never exposes attack surface to the internet, and support for federated identity providers lets you enforce MFA across resources that typically have none. Skip this if your primary concern is securing standard IT applications and desktops; plenty of lighter-weight ZTNA platforms handle that use case better and cheaper. Building ops and facilities teams managing legacy BMS and OT systems need remote access that doesn't require VPN infrastructure or hardware changes; Neeve Remote Access Agent solves this by tunneling directly to controllers from desktop and mobile apps through the Neeve portal. The tool maps to NIST PR.AA for access control and PR.IR for infrastructure resilience, meaning you get both authentication enforcement and segmented connectivity without expanding your attack surface. Skip this if your environment is primarily cloud-native SaaS applications or you need cross-platform VPN replacement for general workforce access; Neeve is purpose-built for the OT/BMS use case where legacy systems can't support standard remote access protocols.

Based on our analysis of core features, integrations, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion: