Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access vs Neeve Remote Access Agent by Cloudbrink: 2026 Comparison

Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access

Security teams managing distributed workforces across multiple cloud regions should prioritize Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access for its refusal to backhaul traffic through centralized gateways, which eliminates the bottleneck that tanks performance in traditional ZTNA deployments. The distributed control plane runs entirely on your infrastructure, not Bowtie's, and WireGuard encryption keeps private keys out of vendor hands, addressing the NIST PR.AA identity and access control requirement without trust dependency. This isn't for buyers seeking integrated secure web gateway capabilities from a single vendor; Bowtie's on-device SWG component is functional but plays second fiddle to its network access core.

Neeve Remote Access Agent by Cloudbrink

Building ops and facilities teams managing legacy BMS and OT systems need remote access that doesn't require VPN infrastructure or hardware changes; Neeve Remote Access Agent solves this by tunneling directly to controllers from desktop and mobile apps through the Neeve portal. The tool maps to NIST PR.AA for access control and PR.IR for infrastructure resilience, meaning you get both authentication enforcement and segmented connectivity without expanding your attack surface. Skip this if your environment is primarily cloud-native SaaS applications or you need cross-platform VPN replacement for general workforce access; Neeve is purpose-built for the OT/BMS use case where legacy systems can't support standard remote access protocols.