Core Security Outflank Security Tooling vs Mythic: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Core Security Outflank Security Tooling

Mid-market and enterprise red teams will find Outflank Security Tooling essential for testing EDR bypass at scale; its steganography-based payload concealment and unpublished EDR evasion techniques let operators validate detection gaps that commodity toolkits can't expose. The continuous operator documentation and Cobalt Strike integration mean your team stays current as vendors patch, and on-premises deployment keeps artifacts off shared infrastructure. Skip this if your mandate is offensive security without a specific EDR validation requirement; Outflank assumes you're already comfortable with advanced post-exploitation and are hunting for the gaps most red teams never find.

Mythic

Red teams and penetration testers who need a free, collaborative framework for running multi-stage attack simulations will find Mythic's agent-based architecture and built-in post-exploitation modules significantly faster to orchestrate than building custom scripts. The 4,358 GitHub stars and active open-source community signal sustained development and real operational use. Skip this if your team needs commercial support, a polished UI, or integration with existing SIEM tooling; Mythic demands hands-on operator skill and lives best in environments where customization matters more than convenience.