Cyver Pentest Management Platform vs MTKPI: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Cyver Pentest Management Platform is a commercial penetration testing tool by Cyver. MTKPI is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Cyver Pentest Management Platform
SMBs and mid-market firms running penetration testing programs will see immediate ROI from Cyver Pentest Management Platform because it collapses the manual work of report generation, finding remediation tracking, and client handoff into one tool instead of juggling three separate systems. The platform's AI-driven report automation and white-labeled portal directly address ID.RA and RS.AN coverage by forcing structured risk assessment and incident documentation into your workflow rather than leaving it to spreadsheets. Skip this if you need continuous offensive security or threat hunting; Cyver is a pentest operations tool, not a managed detection service.
Kubernetes security teams who need to validate their cluster defenses without waiting for vendor tooling will move fastest with MTKPI. It's a free Docker image pre-loaded with pentest essentials, so you skip procurement cycles and start testing within minutes; the 255 GitHub stars reflect active use in the community. Skip this if your team lacks Linux command-line fluency or needs guided remediation workflows; MTKPI is a sharp tool for practitioners, not a platform for junior analysts.
