Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Microsoft Entra ID is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by Microsoft. MIRACL Trust® MFA is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by MIRACL. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best multi-factor authentication and single sign-on fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Enterprise and mid-market teams already committed to Microsoft 365 should choose Microsoft Entra ID because it eliminates the identity tax of managing a separate platform, with conditional access policies that actually enforce what your Microsoft-native apps require. NIST CSF 2.0 coverage on PR.AA (Identity Management, Authentication, and Access Control) is solid, and the integration with Security Copilot means threat investigation workflows stay within your existing Microsoft ecosystem rather than forcing context-switching. Skip this if you need deep API governance or fine-grained entitlements for non-Microsoft SaaS applications; Entra ID treats those as secondary use cases, and you'll end up stitching in third-party tools anyway.
Mid-market and enterprise teams handling PSD2-regulated transactions or managing high-risk user populations will find MIRACL Trust® MFA's zero-knowledge proof architecture genuinely harder to compromise than PIN-based or OTP competitors, since credentials never exist in transmissible form. The ISO/IEC-approved M-Pin protocol and Distributed Trust Authority design eliminate the credential database compromise that haunts traditional MFA vendors. Skip this if you need broad OIDC federation out of the box or plan to deploy across devices you can't control; the rooted device restrictions and SDK-first integration model demand more engineering overhead than cookie-cutter MFA solutions.
Cloud-based identity and access management solution for enterprises
Cloud-based MFA using zero-knowledge proofs for PSD2-compliant SCA.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Microsoft Entra ID vs MIRACL Trust® MFA for your multi-factor authentication and single sign-on needs.
Microsoft Entra ID: Cloud-based identity and access management solution for enterprises. built by Microsoft. Core capabilities include Multi-factor authentication (MFA), Single sign-on (SSO), Passwordless authentication..
MIRACL Trust® MFA: Cloud-based MFA using zero-knowledge proofs for PSD2-compliant SCA. built by MIRACL. Core capabilities include Zero-knowledge proof authentication via M-Pin protocol (ISO/IEC approved), Software token issuance to web browsers and mobile apps (incomplete, non-revealing), 4-digit PIN-based knowledge factor authentication..
Both serve the Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Microsoft Entra ID differentiates with Multi-factor authentication (MFA), Single sign-on (SSO), Passwordless authentication. MIRACL Trust® MFA differentiates with Zero-knowledge proof authentication via M-Pin protocol (ISO/IEC approved), Software token issuance to web browsers and mobile apps (incomplete, non-revealing), 4-digit PIN-based knowledge factor authentication.
Microsoft Entra ID is developed by Microsoft. MIRACL Trust® MFA is developed by MIRACL. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Microsoft Entra ID integrates with Microsoft 365, Security Copilot. MIRACL Trust® MFA integrates with Android (SDK), iOS (SDK), RADIUS, SSO. Check integration compatibility with your existing security stack before deciding.
Microsoft Entra ID and MIRACL Trust® MFA serve similar Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On use cases: both are Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On tools, both cover MFA, Authentication, SSO. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox