MicroSec Protection Suite vs SEALSQ Automotive EV Charging: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

MicroSec Protection Suite

Mid-market and enterprise teams securing brownfield IoT/OT networks need MicroSec Protection Suite because it actually handles resource-constrained devices and legacy microcontrollers without requiring rip-and-replace architecture. The platform's post-quantum safe PKI and cryptographic firmware verification directly address NIST CSF 2.0 supply chain risk and asset management gaps that most OT vendors ignore. Skip this if your environment is purely IT-facing or you need visibility tools; MicroSec is device hardening and inventory control, not threat detection.

SEALSQ Automotive EV Charging

Enterprise and mid-market OT security teams protecting EV charging networks should evaluate SEALSQ Automotive EV Charging for its ISO 15118 Plug & Charge compliance and integrated PKI lifecycle management, which eliminates the common gap between charger hardware and identity provisioning that leaves most deployments vulnerable to protocol-level attacks. The vendor's VaultIC secure elements handle both certificate management and firmware updates within the same silicon, addressing the NIST PR.AA and PR.DS functions that most charging operators struggle to implement consistently across distributed charger fleets. Skip this if your EV charging infrastructure is still running legacy non-connected chargers or if you need application-layer visibility beyond the charging protocol itself; SEALSQ focuses narrowly on the authentication and encryption layer, not fleet operations or grid integration.