mhn-core-docker vs TANNER: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
mhn-core-docker is a free honeypots & deception tool. TANNER is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building internal threat intelligence labs or validating detection rules will find real value in mhn-core-docker because it collapses the friction of spinning up a multi-honeypot network; the Docker containerization cuts deployment time from hours to minutes, and the geolocation-enriched event stream gives you immediately actionable attack patterns. The 35 GitHub stars and active cowrie/dionaea integration suggest steady maintenance for a free tool. Skip this if you need managed honeypot infrastructure with SLA guarantees or commercial support; mhn-core-docker requires hands-on ops work and assumes comfort debugging containerized environments.
Security teams deploying SNARE honeypots will find TANNER's value in its ability to automate realistic HTTP response generation and vulnerability emulation without maintaining separate backend infrastructure. The free pricing model and active GitHub presence (231 stars) make it practical for resource-constrained security operations looking to increase honeypot fidelity without headcount. TANNER is built for detection and intelligence gathering; it won't help teams that need honeypots integrated into a broader incident response or threat hunting platform.
