Messageware EPG vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Messageware EPG

Mid-market and enterprise teams running on-premises Exchange Server need Messageware EPG for its protocol-level attack detection, which stops both high-volume brute force and low-volume targeted password guessing that Active Directory lockout thresholds miss entirely. The independent lockout system reduces help desk friction while real-time monitoring across nine Exchange protocols catches threats at the gateway before they reach mailboxes. Skip this if you've already migrated to Microsoft 365; EPG is built for hybrid or fully on-premises deployments and won't add value in cloud-only environments.

Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Mid-market and enterprise security teams defending Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace should prioritize Mimecast Advanced Email Security for its social graphing and computer vision capabilities, which catch impersonation and BEC attacks that signature-based filters routinely miss. The platform scores across NIST's Detect and Prevention functions with sandboxing, on-click URL protection, and contextual banners that work together to stop threats after inbox delivery. Skip this if your organization needs email security bundled with broader cloud access control or data loss prevention; Mimecast stays focused on threat detection rather than competing with DLP platforms.