Isolate-X vs Menlo Security File Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Isolate-X

Mid-market and enterprise security teams dealing with phishing and ransomware driven by user click behavior will see immediate value from Isolate-X's browser isolation approach, which removes the endpoint as an attack surface entirely. The platform's backend isolation architecture and malicious code removal directly address the gap in NIST PR.PS coverage most organizations face when relying on client-side controls alone. Skip this if your threat model assumes users won't click malicious links; that's not realistic, and Isolate-X knows it.

Menlo Security File Security

SMBs and mid-market teams handling high-volume file intake from untrusted sources will find Menlo Security File Security's real value in its breadth: 220+ file type support means you're actually sanitizing the complex formats that slip past basic content filters, not just PDFs and images. The CDR engine rebuilds files after stripping malicious content while preserving usability, which matters when your users need the output to work immediately without reprocessing. Skip this if your organization primarily needs network-level file scanning rather than endpoint and portal protection, or if you're already comfortable with air-gapped workflows for sensitive file handling.