Acronis DeviceLock DLP vs Matisoft DLP: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Acronis DeviceLock DLP

SMB and mid-market teams with virtualized workforces will find the most value in Acronis DeviceLock DLP, which handles endpoint DLP across RDS, Citrix, and VMware environments without requiring separate agents per platform. The combination of USB blocking, application-level controls, and native Active Directory integration means enforcement works immediately after Group Policy deployment. Skip this if your organization relies heavily on cloud-native infrastructure or needs behavioral analytics; DeviceLock's strength is prevention through rigid policy, not detection of anomalous user activity, which leaves the ID.RA risk assessment piece incomplete without external SIEM correlation.

Matisoft DLP

SMBs and mid-market firms with on-premises infrastructure and high USB-transfer risk will find value in Matisoft DLP's hardware firewall approach to device control; the USB Vault with granular access controls and 180-day logging covers a gap that most cloud-native DLP vendors ignore. Active Directory integration and department-level file restrictions make enforcement straightforward for lean security teams. Skip this if your workforce is distributed across SaaS applications or you need cloud-native DLP that doesn't require on-premises appliances; Matisoft's strength is legacy endpoint and physical media, not lateral movement within modern stacks.