Lunar vs MalPipe: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Lunar is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Webz.io. MalPipe is a free threat intelligence platforms tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.
Threat intelligence analysts and malware researchers running custom feed pipelines will get the most from MalPipe because its modular architecture lets you chain together collection, detonation, and enrichment steps without vendor lock-in. The 109 GitHub stars and active maintenance suggest real adoption in labs and incident response shops. Skip this if your team needs a managed SaaS platform with turnkey feeds and no infrastructure lift; MalPipe requires Python competency and operational overhead to extract feeds and build your own processing logic.
