Burp-LFI-tests vs LFISuite: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Burp-LFI-tests is a free penetration testing tool. LFISuite is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers who need to systematically test for Local File Inclusion flaws will find Burp-LFI-tests valuable because it consolidates proven LFI payloads and exploitation chains into a Burp extension, cutting manual payload crafting time during assessments. The tool is free and maintained on GitHub with solid community engagement, removing cost friction from your toolkit. This is not a replacement for manual testing or general vulnerability scanning; it's narrowly built for LFI-focused work, so teams expecting broad web vulnerability coverage or automated exploitation should look elsewhere.
Penetration testers running manual web application assessments will find LFISuite valuable for identifying and exploiting LFI vulnerabilities that automated scanners frequently miss; its free pricing and 1,860 GitHub stars indicate active community use among practitioners who need a lightweight, focused tool rather than bloated commercial suites. The tool shines in the reconnaissance and exploitation phases of NIST CSF 2.0 Govern functions, letting you map file inclusion paths quickly during engagement scoping. Skip this if your workflow demands integrated payload generation, post-exploitation automation, or support for complex PHP wrappers; LFISuite is deliberately narrow in scope.
