FourCore ATTACK vs Katana: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
FourCore ATTACK is a commercial offensive security tool by FourCore. Katana is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams that need to prove their defenses actually work against real adversary tactics will get the most from FourCore ATTACK. Its adversary emulation engine forces you to test detection and response workflows with evidence of what failed, moving beyond checkbox compliance toward ID.RA risk assessment that sticks with your board. Skip this if your team lacks the security maturity to act on emulation findings; the tool surfaces gaps faster than your people can typically close them.
Security teams running reconnaissance workflows or building custom crawling pipelines will get the most from Katana; the 14K GitHub stars reflect genuine adoption by practitioners who need fine-grained control over spidering logic rather than point-and-click scanners. The framework approach means you're writing code to extract what matters to your target scope, which beats generic crawlers for complex authentication flows or JavaScript-heavy applications. Skip this if your team lacks engineering resources or needs a managed SaaS interface; Katana requires Python knowledge and infrastructure to operationalize.
