Bitdefender GravityZone Platform vs Kaspersky: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Bitdefender GravityZone Platform

Mid-market and enterprise security teams juggling multiple vendors will consolidate faster with Bitdefender GravityZone Platform because its EDR, XDR, and MDR stack actually talk to each other instead of creating separate alert streams. The platform's incident advisor maps findings directly to MITRE ATT&CK, which cuts triage time when you're deciding what matters, and tunable machine learning lets you dial down false positives instead of drowning in them. Skip this if you need deep forensics and recovery orchestration; GravityZone prioritizes detection and containment over post-incident automation.

Kaspersky

Startups and SMBs protecting critical infrastructure or running specialized industrial environments should consider Kaspersky for its threat intelligence feeds and deep malware analysis capabilities that catch threats generic EDR misses. The platform scores strongly on NIST Detect and Analyze functions, meaning it excels at finding what's wrong but less so at helping you respond; you'll need mature incident response workflows in place. Skip this if you're building a modern cloud-native stack or expect tight integration with your existing Okta and Slack tooling.