jwt_tool vs Pagodo: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
jwt_tool is a free penetration testing tool. Pagodo is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and security researchers validating JWT implementations will find jwt_tool invaluable for manual token manipulation and cryptographic attacks that automated scanners miss. With 6,066 GitHub stars and active maintenance, it's the go-to for hands-on assessment of signature verification flaws and algorithm confusion vulnerabilities. Skip this if your team needs integration with a larger pentest framework or reporting automation; jwt_tool is purpose-built for testing, not orchestration.
Penetration testers and security researchers who need to quickly surface Google-indexable sensitive data exposures should start with Pagodo; it automates the tedious work of crafting and executing complex Google dork queries that would take hours to run manually. The tool has 3,266 GitHub stars and remains one of the few free, actively maintained scrapers for the Google Hacking Database, making it a no-friction entry point for reconnaissance. Skip this if you're looking for a tool that validates findings or integrates with ticketing systems; Pagodo is discovery and enumeration only, leaving the verification and remediation workflow to you.
