JupiterOne Continuous Evidence Engine vs Scytale: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

JupiterOne Continuous Evidence Engine

Compliance teams running audits across multi-cloud infrastructure will get the most from JupiterOne Continuous Evidence Engine because it actually closes the evidence gap,you stop scrambling for screenshots and manual attestations 48 hours before your audit deadline. The Security Asset Graph maps controls to assets to evidence in queryable relationships, which means your auditors see the chain of custody rather than a folder of PDFs, and the 365-day posture history covers the lookback windows SOC 2 and ISO assessments require. Skip this if your organization runs static, single-cloud infrastructure or has audit cycles so infrequent that batch evidence collection is tolerable; the continuous validation model assumes you need real-time proof of compliance, not point-in-time snapshots.

Scytale

Startups and mid-market companies chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 will move fastest with Scytale because it automates evidence collection instead of forcing manual spreadsheet audits. The platform covers GV.OC, GV.RM, and GV.PO across NIST CSF 2.0, meaning it handles organizational context, policy enforcement, and risk strategy simultaneously rather than bolting compliance onto existing tools. Skip this if you need detection and response capabilities; Scytale stops at monitoring and assessment, not incident investigation.