Cohesity Threat Protection vs HyperBUNKER: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cohesity Threat Protection

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing ransomware risk across hybrid infrastructure should evaluate Cohesity Threat Protection for one reason: it finds clean data in backups faster than manual recovery workflows, which directly shortens incident recovery windows. The AI-powered threat detection scores strongly on NIST RS.MI (incident mitigation) by automating the identification of uninfected snapshots at scale, cutting the guess work out of which backups are safe to restore from. Skip this if your organization has already standardized on a separate backup vendor with embedded threat scanning; Cohesity's strength is concentrated in detection and recovery, not broad backup infrastructure replacement.

HyperBUNKER

Mid-market and enterprise teams facing ransomware attacks need HyperBUNKER's double physical air gap because it recovers critical systems in hours when your backups are compromised or encrypted. The hardware-enforced write-once design and offline storage mean attackers cannot corrupt your recovery path, no matter what credentials they steal or what malware touches your production network. Skip this if your organization lacks the dedicated infrastructure team to manage on-premises hardware or if you need continuous cloud-based backups; HyperBUNKER prioritizes recovery speed and isolation over integration breadth.