Datadog Cloud SIEM vs Huntsman SIEM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Datadog Cloud SIEM

Security teams already running Datadog for infrastructure and application observability should adopt Cloud SIEM to correlate security events with the underlying systems generating them; this eliminates the blind spot of traditional SIEMs that ingest logs in isolation. The platform covers continuous monitoring and incident response (NIST DE.CM and RS.MA), with multi-cloud log ingestion across AWS, Azure, and GCP built in rather than bolted on. Skip this if your priority is forensic depth or compliance reporting; Cloud SIEM is built for detection speed and operational context, not exhaustive audit trails.

Huntsman SIEM

Mid-market and enterprise teams running air-gapped or closed networks will get the most from Huntsman SIEM because it processes high-volume events on a single platform without requiring internet connectivity for updates or threat intelligence feeds. The platform handles 800+ out-of-the-box queries, GPG13 and ISO27001 compliance dashboards, and works across data diodes and multi-layered architectures that most commercial SIEMs treat as edge cases. Skip this if you need native cloud-first detection, tight integrations with mainstream EDR vendors, or vendor support at the scale of a 500-person organization; Huntsman prioritizes detection depth in sealed environments over breadth across hybrid infrastructure.