HOPZERO DataTravel Security vs Packet Capture (cStor®): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

HOPZERO DataTravel Security

MSSPs managing client networks with high exfiltration risk should adopt HOPZERO DataTravel Security to shrink attack surface through network hop limitation, a control most competitors ignore entirely. The platform covers four NIST CSF 2.0 functions across detection and response, with particular strength in continuous monitoring and incident analysis through packet-level forensics. This is not the tool for organizations needing broad network security; it solves a narrow problem for service providers that have already decided hop-limiting fits their containment strategy.

Packet Capture (cStor®)

Enterprise and mid-market security teams investigating protocol-level incidents will find Packet Capture (cStor®) invaluable for its lossless capture at 10–200 Gbps paired with petabyte-scale persistent storage, letting you replay and forensically analyze traffic weeks or months after compromise. The onboard indexing and Wireshark integration mean you're not shipping raw PCAPs offsite for analysis; incident response happens at wire speed with full packet fidelity. This is deliberate forensics tooling, not a detection platform; if you need real-time threat hunting or automated anomaly flagging across the network, you'll want this feeding data to a separate NDR layer.