Is Honeypot-Camera a good alternative to SMTPLLMPot?

Honeypot-Camera and SMTPLLMPot serve similar Honeypots & Deception use cases: both are Honeypots & Deception tools, both cover Proof Of Concept. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Honeypot-Camera vs SMTPLLMPot: Features, Integrations, Reviews (2026) | CybersecTools

Honeypot-Camera vs SMTPLLMPot: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Q: What is the difference between Honeypot-Camera vs SMTPLLMPot?

**Honeypot-Camera**: An observation camera honeypot for proof-of-concept purposes.. **SMTPLLMPot**: A PoC tool for utilizing GPT3.5 in developing an SMTP honeypot.. Both serve the Honeypots & Deception market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.

Honeypot-Camera is a free honeypots & deception tool. SMTPLLMPot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.

CST Verdict

Based on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:

Honeypot-Camera

Security teams running proof-of-concept deception deployments will find Honeypot-Camera useful for observation-layer validation without licensing friction. The free price point and minimal GitHub activity (53 stars) suggest this is purpose-built for small-scale testing rather than production scale, making it ideal for teams prototyping honeypot strategies before committing to commercial platforms. Skip this if you need continuous monitoring across multiple decoy systems or integration with SIEM workflows; Honeypot-Camera is explicitly a PoC tool, not an operational deception infrastructure.

Data verified May 2026