What is the difference between Acalvio ShadowPlex Cloud Security vs SMTPLLMPot?

**Acalvio ShadowPlex Cloud Security**: AI-powered deception platform for cloud threat detection using honeytokens. built by Acalvio Technologies. Core capabilities include AI-powered honeytoken deployment across cloud environments, Agentless deployment via native cloud APIs, Multi-cloud threat detection across AWS, Azure, and GCP.. **SMTPLLMPot**: A PoC tool for utilizing GPT3.5 in developing an SMTP honeypot.. Both serve the Honeypots & Deception market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Is Acalvio ShadowPlex Cloud Security a good alternative to SMTPLLMPot?

Acalvio ShadowPlex Cloud Security and SMTPLLMPot serve similar Honeypots & Deception use cases: both are Honeypots & Deception tools. Key differences: Acalvio ShadowPlex Cloud Security is Commercial while SMTPLLMPot is Free, SMTPLLMPot is open-source. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Acalvio ShadowPlex Cloud Security vs SMTPLLMPot: 2026 Comparison Guide | CybersecTools

Acalvio ShadowPlex Cloud Security vs SMTPLLMPot: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.

Acalvio ShadowPlex Cloud Security is a commercial honeypots & deception tool by Acalvio Technologies. SMTPLLMPot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.

CST Verdict

Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:

Acalvio ShadowPlex Cloud Security

Enterprise and mid-market teams managing multi-cloud infrastructure should adopt ShadowPlex Cloud Security if detecting lateral movement and privilege escalation in cloud identities is your weakest detection layer. Agentless deployment via native cloud APIs means you're live in AWS, Azure, and GCP without touching workloads, and the honeytoken approach catches attackers during reconnaissance when they're still gathering credentials rather than after breach. This tool prioritizes detection and intent capture over response automation, so it's less valuable for teams already confident in their cloud identity monitoring or those expecting the platform to enforce remediation workflows.

Data verified May 2026