Honeygrove vs MokN Bait: 2026 Comparison
Honeygrove is a free honeypots & deception tool. MokN Bait is a commercial honeypots & deception tool by MokN. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Teams defending industrial control systems or running lab environments where you need fast honeypot deployment will find Honeygrove's native Siemens S7 protocol support genuinely useful; most open-source honeypots treat ICS as an afterthought. The modular Python architecture means you can spin up a functional trap in hours rather than weeks, and the 20 GitHub stars reflect a small but active maintainer base. Skip this if you need commercial support, pre-built integrations with your SIEM, or honeypots spanning multiple protocols; Honeygrove is purpose-built for depth in one protocol, not breadth across many.
Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in credential stuffing and password spray attacks need MokN Bait because it stops attackers at the moment they try stolen passwords, not weeks later in logs. Cloud deployment means no infrastructure work, and the zero false positive guarantee matters when your SOC is already understaffed; you get signal instead of noise. Skip this if your threat model is primarily external perimeter attacks rather than post-breach lateral movement, or if your team lacks basic credential hygiene to make decoy baits credible.
