Honeygrove vs CatchProbe SmartDeceptive: 2026 Comparison
Honeygrove is a free honeypots & deception tool. CatchProbe SmartDeceptive is a commercial honeypots & deception tool by CatchProbe. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Teams defending industrial control systems or running lab environments where you need fast honeypot deployment will find Honeygrove's native Siemens S7 protocol support genuinely useful; most open-source honeypots treat ICS as an afterthought. The modular Python architecture means you can spin up a functional trap in hours rather than weeks, and the 20 GitHub stars reflect a small but active maintainer base. Skip this if you need commercial support, pre-built integrations with your SIEM, or honeypots spanning multiple protocols; Honeygrove is purpose-built for depth in one protocol, not breadth across many.
Mid-market and enterprise security teams defending OT/ICS environments will find CatchProbe SmartDeceptive's protocol-level trap deployment invaluable; it's one of the few deception platforms that actually speaks SCADA and industrial protocols instead of just HTTP. The AI-driven trap placement cuts false positives that plague manual honeypot setups, and hybrid deployment means you can bait attackers on both cloud and plant floors. Skip this if your threat model is purely cloud-native SaaS applications or if you need a deception tool that doubles as a full detection platform; SmartDeceptive is explicitly built to feed threat intelligence into your existing security stack, not replace it.
