Hash Extender vs LFI-Enum: 2026 Comparison
Hash Extender is a free penetration testing tool. LFI-Enum is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers validating MD5 and SHA-1 implementations should start with Hash Extender; it's the fastest way to confirm length extension vulnerabilities without writing custom exploit code. The tool supports seven hash algorithms and runs as a standalone CLI, meaning no dependencies or setup friction during engagements. Skip this if your targets use modern hash constructs like SHA-3 or HMAC-based schemes; Hash Extender is built for legacy systems and will sit idle on most contemporary infrastructure.
Penetration testers validating LFI vulnerabilities in Linux applications will move faster with LFI-Enum's automation; manual enumeration through these flaws is tedious and error-prone, and this tool cuts that work by half. The 89 GitHub stars and active maintenance suggest real adoption in red team workflows. Skip this if you need a polished commercial interface or post-exploitation capabilities beyond reconnaissance; LFI-Enum is purpose-built for one job and stops there.
