Harpoon vs Kubesploit: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Harpoon is a free offensive security tool. Kubesploit is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building container testing programs or red-teaming Kubernetes deployments should grab Harpoon for its distilled attack patterns and exploitation techniques specific to orchestration layers. At 142 GitHub stars with active community contribution, it's proven useful enough that practitioners keep referencing it in their labs and assessments. This is a reference guide and technique collection, not a scanning or detection tool, so skip it if you need automated vulnerability identification or compliance reporting; Harpoon teaches you how to break things, not find what's already broken.
Red teamers and penetration testers targeting containerized infrastructure need Kubesploit because it's purpose-built for post-exploitation inside Kubernetes and Docker, not adapted from traditional C2 frameworks. The HTTP/2 foundation and cross-platform support mean faster command execution and easier lateral movement across heterogeneous container stacks without the noise of frameworks designed for bare metal. Skip this if your mandate is detecting container compromise rather than simulating it; Kubesploit is explicitly an offensive tool, and it won't help you build detection logic.
