Android port of Radamsa vs Harpoon: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. Harpoon is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Security teams building container testing programs or red-teaming Kubernetes deployments should grab Harpoon for its distilled attack patterns and exploitation techniques specific to orchestration layers. At 142 GitHub stars with active community contribution, it's proven useful enough that practitioners keep referencing it in their labs and assessments. This is a reference guide and technique collection, not a scanning or detection tool, so skip it if you need automated vulnerability identification or compliance reporting; Harpoon teaches you how to break things, not find what's already broken.
