Harbinger vs Lunar: 2026 Comparison
Harbinger is a free threat intelligence platforms tool. Lunar is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Webz.io. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Security teams doing quick reputation checks on indicators during triage will appreciate Harbinger's speed; it aggregates four major feeds (VirusTotal, URLVoid, IPVoid, Cymon) into a single query instead of tab-switching across services. The free model and 83 GitHub stars suggest it's battle-tested by practitioners who needed a lightweight CLI tool rather than a commercial platform. Skip this if you need enrichment at scale or automated feeds integrated into your SOAR; Harbinger is manual lookup, not ingestion.
Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.
