Habu Hacking Toolkit vs hakrawler: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Habu Hacking Toolkit is a free penetration testing tool. hakrawler is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building internal red team capacity on a budget should reach for Habu Hacking Toolkit; it gives you Python-native attack primitives that integrate cleanly into custom exploitation workflows without licensing friction. The 973 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal a tool mature enough for repeatable penetration testing scenarios. Skip this if your team needs a GUI-driven platform or commercial support; Habu demands Python fluency and rewards operators who read code, not buttons.
Penetration testers and bug bounty hunters who need fast endpoint discovery during reconnaissance should start with hakrawler; it crawls web applications an order of magnitude quicker than manual mapping, with 4,841 GitHub stars reflecting sustained adoption by practitioners who run it continuously across engagement kickoffs. The tool's speed comes from its parallelized crawling architecture, which surfaces forgotten endpoints and asset exposure before deeper testing begins. Skip this if your mandate is vulnerability scoring or compliance reporting; hakrawler is reconnaissance-only, and you'll need separate tools for exploitation and risk quantification.
