GuardDog vs AuditJS: 2026 Comparison
GuardDog is a free software composition analysis tool. AuditJS is a free software composition analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best software composition analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Development teams shipping Python and Node.js packages should use GuardDog for pre-publication malware screening because its heuristics-based approach catches obfuscated and supply-chain attacks that signature-based tools miss. The CLI integrates directly into CI/CD pipelines at zero cost, catching malicious dependencies before they reach registries. Skip GuardDog if you need runtime monitoring of already-installed packages or deep visibility into legitimate but vulnerable code; it's built for prevention at the source, not forensics on deployed systems.
JavaScript teams shipping npm packages on tight release cycles should use AuditJS for its zero-friction dependency scanning; it runs offline via command line and integrates directly into CI/CD without vendor lock-in. The tool covers the most common attack vector in Node ecosystems,transitive dependency vulnerabilities,and the 230 GitHub stars reflect active adoption among teams that value simplicity over breadth. Skip AuditJS if you need runtime vulnerability detection, license compliance scanning, or policy enforcement across polyglot codebases; it's deliberately narrow, scanning only declared npm dependencies against known databases.
