CatchProbe SmartDeceptive vs GridPot: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
CatchProbe SmartDeceptive is a commercial honeypots & deception tool by CatchProbe. GridPot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams defending OT/ICS environments will find CatchProbe SmartDeceptive's protocol-level trap deployment invaluable; it's one of the few deception platforms that actually speaks SCADA and industrial protocols instead of just HTTP. The AI-driven trap placement cuts false positives that plague manual honeypot setups, and hybrid deployment means you can bait attackers on both cloud and plant floors. Skip this if your threat model is purely cloud-native SaaS applications or if you need a deception tool that doubles as a full detection platform; SmartDeceptive is explicitly built to feed threat intelligence into your existing security stack, not replace it.
Power grid operators and critical infrastructure teams testing ICS attack scenarios need GridPot because it simulates realistic grid environments without requiring expensive hardware; the framework's integration of GridLAB-D for power system dynamics with Conpot's industrial protocol emulation means you can detect attacks against SCADA systems that generic honeypots miss. The 61 GitHub stars and free pricing make this accessible for proof-of-concept work, but GridPot is built for detection-heavy operations; it won't help teams focused on forensics or incident response workflows after an attack surfaces.
