Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL vs Titania: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL

Security teams managing multiple Greenbone vulnerability scanners across hybrid infrastructure will pick OPENVAS CONTROL for its ability to orchestrate collective actions and system updates from a single pane of glass, eliminating the operational drag of managing each appliance independently. The platform covers ID.AM and ID.RA in NIST CSF 2.0 through centralized asset visibility and risk aggregation across distributed sensors, with bidirectional connection initiation enabling deployment into restricted network segments. Skip this if your organization runs a single Greenbone instance or needs vulnerability management from multiple vendors in one console; OPENVAS CONTROL is purpose-built for Greenbone environments at scale.

Titania

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing heterogeneous network devices need Titania for its ability to surface configuration drift and compliance violations before attackers exploit them. The platform covers six compliance frameworks including CMMC and FISHA, and its real-time change visibility catches deviations that periodic scans miss, directly strengthening your ID.AM and DE.CM posture. Skip this if your environment is purely cloud-native or if you need deep application vulnerability scanning; Titania's strength is network infrastructure hardening, not code-layer risk.